raise questions about responsibility

Biohacking communities often work collaboratively, sharing knowledge, techniques, and even experimental results. These activities, while fostering innovation, also raise questions about responsibility and accountability. If an individual biohacker suffers harm or if a genetically modified organism inadvertently affects the environment, it remains unclear who would bear legal liability. The EU’s existing legal frameworks primarily address institutional responsibility (e.g., corporations or research institutions) rather than distributed, decentralized communities of individuals. As a result, EU regulations struggle to define clear accountability in cases where harm is caused by biohacking activities. This loophole means that biohacking communities can operate with a degree of legal anonymity, potentially exposing both individuals and society to unregulated risks. สล็อต เว็บตรง